In s statement before the Indiana Senate Local Government Committee Mr. Stuart Easley, a member of the Fishers Town Council, make the remark that Fishers Police Department provides police protection to the Geist area they are trying to annex. Well, Stu, glad to see you are keeping up your misleading statements of half-truths. A detail review of three months of police run data from the Indy Star indicates that Fishers PD did make runs to the Geist area but only 10% of the runs and actually many of these were not runs but rather traffic stops on streets that are shared with Geist or border on the Geist community. In addition several of those runs were to assist the County Sheriff in an arrest and several others were investigations and not true runs.
So Stu, I want to know, as a research scientist at Lilly, do you collect data on your projects the same way?
Also Stu, public service is a public trust. If you keep making up stories and data maybe you should leave public office, as how can anyone trust what you say.
Comments 3
When Stu made the statement, that "a great majority of police runs to the Geist area are made by Fishers Police", to the Senate committee, there was a very loud outburst from the citizens of Geist, who knew he was telling a lie. Stu's reaction was, "hook me up to a lie detector". (Some people will say anything when cornered.) But, knowing Stu, he would probably pass the lie detector test, because he tells so many that it has become second nature and he convinces himself that he IS telling the truth. It's a pathological condition, he just can't help it.
Notice he has not responded to the facts, the police run data is factual, Stuart has not been factual during this entire annexation process. I now have to wonder about his real job as a researcher at Lilly, is he factual in data on new drugs. I wonder?
As Stu is a Lilly regulatory person I for one as a Lilly stockholder hope that Stu does not "lie" on FDA reports